My Beliefnet Quiz Results

I have taken the following quiz many times, but I wanted to put my results on my blog so that I'd know where to find them.

Here are my results from http://www.beliefnet.com/story/76/story_7665_1.html (In real life I am a Unitarian Universalist, an atheist, and I subscribe to many humanistic ideals):

1. Secular Humanism (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (92%)
3. Nontheist (80%)
4. Liberal Quakers (71%)
5. Theravada Buddhism (66%)
6. Neo-Pagan (60%)

So, according to the quiz, I am right where I should be.

Comments

C. L. Hanson said…
I really don't like this quiz. I think it's totally inappropriate that the atheistic response to every question is lumped in with "or unsure or unimportant." How can one hope to get reasonable data from such skewed questions?

Question #1 should be changed to the following: "Do you think that tales of miracles or other supernatural events are are true/accurate?"
(a) They are fiction and/or based on errors or misunderstandings.
(b) Some are non-fiction. Or not sure. Or not important.
Fri May 11, 12:22:00 AM PDT
Hüffenhardt said…
Yes, it irks me, too, that the atheistic responses are lumped in with "unsure or unimportant".
Fri May 11, 05:12:00 AM PDT
Anonymous said…
See your points, but I enjoy doing it every once in a while to see what the results are. Some how it keeps coming up as my #1 religious choice, Reform Judaism (go figure).
Fri May 11, 01:43:00 PM PDT
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I left the LDS Church

[Last edited 1/28/10] I was a very deeply spiritual person and easily moved to tears when thinking of the Savior and the sacrifices I believed he made for me and the rich blessings he bestowed upon me. I was born in the covenant to convert parents who were very active in the Church and true believers. I had a strong testimony of Joseph Smith and the restoration even before turning eight for I had recognized the joy of the Spirit and the love for mankind I felt when reading the Book of Mormon. And after turning eight, I had an experience which I considered to be a visitation of an angel. When I was 14, my mother passed away. I felt very much alone and learned through that experience to lean on the Lord even more. I decided that I would do what was right because it was the path to happiness, not to please my dad or because of fear of punishment. I felt particularly close to Heavenly Father over the next few years, having had countless experiences of answered prayers, premonitions that w...
Read more

My Patriarchal Blessing

First an intro: Sister Mary Lisa recently posted parts of her patriarchal blessing on her blog. I have decided to do the same. I used to believe in this document so much. I believed that God was personally telling me how much he loved me and how highly he thought of me and what he had in store for me and the mission he sent me to earth to accomplish. I even made my PB into Section 139 of my Doctrine and Covenants and divided it into verses and inserted cross references to other scriptures. It really is beautiful and inspiring and I think patriarchal blessings in general are good for raising people's self-esteem. But, that good does not make up for what I believe to be the misdirection it gives believers. Believers make very important life decisions based on this blessing, which would be great if it actually came from God, but since in all likelihood it is nothing more than the words of an old man inspired by nothing more than his own thoughts and experiences, it can be quite danger...
Read more

Spalding's "Manuscript Found" vs "Manuscript Story"

I don't claim to know who or how the BoM was written. But, there is one point of confusion about the Spalding-Rigdon theory that has been exacerbated by most who have written on the subject, both anti and apologist alike. It is very important that anyone looking into this topic understand what I am about to tell you as most everything that has been written on the Spalding-Rigdon theory focuses on the wrong book. I am borrowing generously from websites for which I will provide links to below. The following is from: http://www.mormoninformation.com/srtheory.htm The "Spalding-Rigdon theory" was first given wide publicity in 1834 with the publication of the book Mormonism Unvailed. In it, the author followed up on indications previously published in Ohio-based newspapers that a man named Solomon Spalding was the real (and unwitting) originator of the Book of Mormon. To make an extremely long story very, very short, the theory goes that Solomon Spalding authored a work called...
Read more